Return to site

The Consequences of Using Data Generated from Nazi Experimentation

Shalom Lamm

· Nazi Experimentation
broken image

Real estate entrepreneur Shalom Lamm is interested in military history, especially as it relates to Jewish history and WWII. Shalom Lamm has been actively involved with Operation Benjamin, a project that involves changing the grave markers of Jewish soldiers who fought and perished in WWII.

An oversight, recognizing the faith of slain Jewish soldiers and their contributions to the war effort comes at a time when modern science is testing modern research ethics in relationship to using data from Nazi experimentation. In a very practical way, some people assume that using data harvested in an unethical manner without regard to the human’s dignity, safety, or respect is acceptable, especially if it overwhelmingly benefits society. Even with these advances, though, there a few consequences.

Some of the most glaring examples of the way data has been used from unethical Nazi experiments are hyperthermia experiments. These trials involved Nazis immersing Jewish prisoners in ice-cold water until they fell unconscious. This data led to discoveries a few decades later on how to revive people who have fallen into ice-cold water.

While this information has been integral to advancing healthcare in this instance, many believe the practice makes researchers complicit in the original wrongdoing, which is a common view held in the field. Alternatively, others believe that the information can be used providing there is transparency regarding how the information was gathered.
Another consequence of using good data harvested from bad deeds is the possibility of establishing a pattern of questionable practices, even in this age of new thought regarding medical ethics. An example would be blood samples taken from newborn babies whose heels were pricked. For close to 38 years ending in 2003, these samples were taken from Scottish babies to check for genetic conditions and are a valuable source of information for researchers. Because they were collected without consent, a moratorium has been placed on the use of this information. While the information is good, researchers open the door to ethical conundrums such as these when not respecting ethical practices.